The persons who retained longest the values of an earlier time were the men who lived their lives in office
This statement was made by R.L. White in his insightful book Waterloo to Peterloo. He was writing about the British Government following the years after 1815 but he could easily be writing of our present time (albeit he would need to replace ‘men’ with ‘men and women’!).
Whether it is a failure to understand the multiplicity of forces unleashed during the Brexit referendum or the alienation of people living in high rise tower blocks the remoteness of our leaders from the lives of the majority of citizens is leading Britain along a disastrous path. This is before we take into account the pace of change in technology which will eliminate a large proportion of relatively well-paid middle-class jobs within a generation. For example the availability of cheap on-the-fly and almost 100 percent accurate digital language translation services will render human translators virtually extinct within the next five to ten tears. Similar stories are to be found in many areas of technology. Yet no acknowledgement let alone preparation to meet this advancing cull of jobs is made by the Governing class.
Complacent commentators will point out that we have faced this situation before during the past three hundred years and that other jobs will inevitably appear to replace those lost. They omit, however, to mention those new jobs were directly or indirectly fostered by Government investment. The widespread development and renovation of London in the late eighteenth century, the huge boost to industrial progress via a massive naval build-up and the expansion of Government administration are merely three examples. Set against those projects, HS2 hardly rates a mention! But can we really expect toff Boris Johnson or any of the Oxbridge PPE professional political class to really understand the forces which are shaping the modern world.
It would be untrue to say that the current cabinet bore any relation to their early nineteenth equivalents of the Waterloo to Peterloo (which occurreed in 1819) period of White’s book, being composed almost entirely of upper middle class and the aristocracy (in which Boris would be the pleb!). Nevertheless, the fatal flaws of archaic attitude also pervades the current incumbents. Maybe there is something about the British political system which drags back even the most progressive of intentions. It is an issue which those who advocate the value of tradition frequently miss.
Tradition not only works for the already privileged, by definition it does so by maitaining an atmosphere of archaic smugness. It enables Theresa May to run a Government desperately trying to return to the financial rules which dominated her professional life in banking from 1977 to 1997, long before the financial crash and brutal austerity. It also provides her with a sense of self-destiny engendering an arrogance that Brexit can be delivered by a few handpicked people who are clearly out of their depth. This may precipitate as big a disaster as any which befell a nineteenth century British administration.
Wrining of the final retirement of that Government which included the disaster of the Peterloo massacre which the poet Shelley railed so passionately against in Mask of Anarchy, White wrote this equally telling statement.
They rode the whirlwind without pretense of controlling the storm. They continued to hold office with a good show of complacency and they left office at the last with unshaken self-esteem.
A similar epithet may be written about the current Government.